Since the massacre in Connecticut in December, American conservatives have been bending over backward to explain away what happened. They are certain that it had nothing to do with guns. So certain, in fact, that some have even begun to float around a story that the massacre was fabricated, and that it was all part of an elaborate hoax by President Obama and "the liberals" to take away everyone's guns. They adamantly resist every hint or suggestion regarding modifying existing gun laws, claiming that their constitutional liberties are being trampled.
Some of the more egregious examples that I have seen are Catholic priests blogging or posting on social media about guns: how fun they are, how good they are, and how noble they are. One "famous" blogger definitely comes to mind, but so do other much less famous priests in my acquaintance.
These conservative people are also gearing up to "march on Washington" this month to protest Roe v. Wade. Why? Because aborting children is wrong. And it is. But it has nothing to do with the true sense that all human life is sacred, but rather some "noble" duty to protect "innocents."
Twenty children at Sandy Hook Elementary School in CT were innocent.
Every child that dies in the streets of Chicago or LA is innocent.
Every child whose body is ripped apart and burned from drone strikes is innocent.
Unless you oppose violence in all of its forms, you cannot call yourself "pro-life." You're anti-abortion.
And if your first reaction in the face of all of this is to try to protect guns- as if the multi-billion dollar gun industry needs your protection- then you are, in fact, part of the same evil that makes it socially acceptable to abort babies. Because you don't value human life above all else. You don't treasure every other human person as a face of God, beloved by God, and known by God.
Every life is precious. Period. Stop. No buts, ands, or ifs. Every life is precious. If even one life is expendable, they are all expendable. And if phallic boom sticks are more important to you than a civil conversation about gun regulations that could save lives, "pro-life" you decidedly are not.
Pax et bonum
Preach it, brother!
ReplyDeleteI'm trying. :)
DeleteHelp us out! Come on! Please!
ReplyDeleteWe only need 49 more signatures to go
public on the White House website
for Inauguration Day Monday Jan. 21, 2013.
End Drone Strikes Killing Children and
innocent civilians!
http://wh.gov/UKpQ
(case sensitive -
please tell your friends!)
Thanks for the link and the info!
DeleteYou can't have it both ways - either it's because of the guns, or it's because of the people who use guns.
ReplyDeleteIf it's because of the guns, then, I hope in the name of integrity, you are ready to ban all, even potentially, dangerous objects.
If it's because of the people, then it's even more confusing as it's unlikely that non-law-abiding population will hand over their guns to the government.
Pro-gun people are, in fact, very much pro-life as they want to defend themselves in case of emergency to save their own and other's lives.
I think you've missed the point.
DeleteSo, what was the point of this entry?
DeleteIf abortion is wrong, then, in the light of your stance of banning guns, you're ready to ban the abortion, right?
ReplyDeleteMy stance is not to "ban guns." Re-read.
DeleteSo, what's your stance, then?
DeleteMeaningful, deliberate regulation, both of weaponry and ownership
DeleteBut again, that's beside the point of what I wrote.
DeleteIt didn't work in Chicago or Washington DC, so why do you still stand by gun control?
Delete"Every life is precious. Period. Stop. No buts, ands, or ifs." Yes. Thank you. From the other comments it looks as if writing about reason isn't working, but still, thank you for trying. :-)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the encouragement. :)
DeletePeter: Why are you being so belligerent? You know exactly what he is trying to say. And if you are not intelligent enough to figure it out, then go to a less intellectually challenging blog.
ReplyDeleteIntelectually challenging? How much time did you spend to come up with this, huh? Both of you are simply funny and entertaining, but not intelectually challenging for sure.
DeleteRick, this is his norm. I don't get it, either.
DeleteFrom your writing, one may think you really have no idea what you're writing about, so I'm not surprised you're so clueless about many things.
DeletePro-Life or Pro-Unborn children, because once they are born, where is the economic and academic justice that will help all children reach their potential?
ReplyDeleteI maintain that pro-life MUST mean after birth. If not, it's not pro-life-- it's anti-abortion.
Deletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/19/vatican-gun-control-_n_2510885.html
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link!
Delete